GoodwillyGiving, lending, passing on

Volunteering

What a Volunteer Coordinator Does All Day

The role sits between people who want to help and work that needs doing, and most of it is not what either side imagines.

Community volunteers working together to clean a public park area, promoting environmental awareness.
Photograph by Galib Rahman Nadim via Pexels
Editorial note. Independent reporting and analysis. Nothing here is sponsored or paid for. How we work.

What follows is the working version of the volunteer coordination role: the decisions in the order you actually meet them, with the reasoning attached.

Before you start

  • Coordination is a scheduling and compliance job before it is a people job.
  • Rota gaps consume a disproportionate share of the working week.
  • The role is frequently funded from the money hardest to raise.

Filling gaps in a rota

The largest recurring demand on a coordinator is covering shifts that have fallen through, often at short notice and often repeatedly with the same slots. Because volunteers are unpaid, the only levers available are persuasion and goodwill, which are slower and less reliable than an employment contract.

A single uncovered weekday morning can close a service, so the work is urgent in a way that keeps displacing everything planned. Coordinators therefore over-recruit deliberately, which creates a pool larger than the roles and its own management burden. Anybody who reliably turns up when they said they would has already solved the coordinator's main problem.

Compliance and record-keeping

Background checks, references, training records, health and safety briefings and insurance declarations all have to be current and evidenced. In organisations working with children or vulnerable adults these requirements are legally enforced and inspected, with the specifics varying by country. Expired records are as much of a problem as missing ones, so the administration is continuous rather than one-off.

Over a funding cycle, this is unglamorous work that produces no visible output and generates a crisis immediately when it has not been done. It is also the part most likely to be underestimated by anyone proposing a quick volunteering initiative.

Matching people to roles

Most enquiries arrive describing what the person would like to do rather than what the organisation needs, so the first task is translation. Placing someone in a role they will dislike produces a rapid dropout and wastes the entire induction investment. Placing someone in a role they cannot do produces a supervision burden that falls on colleagues rather than the coordinator.

Sorting the donation bags, good coordinators therefore decline more offers than they accept, which is uncomfortable and rarely acknowledged as a skill. The judgement involved is closer to recruitment than to hospitality, though the job is often described in the latter terms.

Retention work

Volunteers leave because of unclear expectations, feeling underused, feeling unsupported, or a change in their own circumstances. Only the last of those is outside the coordinator's control, which makes retention a genuine performance measure for the role. Recognition, supervision conversations and being told what the work achieved all reduce dropout, and all take time nobody has allocated.

Losing an experienced volunteer costs the organisation the induction of a replacement plus the knowledge that left with them.

The economics mirror donor retention closely, and organisations that manage one well often manage the other badly.

Handling conflict

Volunteers cannot be managed through pay, promotion or dismissal in the way employees can, so disagreements have fewer formal routes to resolution. Long-serving volunteers sometimes accumulate informal authority that conflicts with paid staff, and unpicking that is delicate and slow.

Problems around conduct, boundaries or capability still have to be addressed, since the organisation carries the liability regardless of employment status. Most organisations have a volunteer agreement setting out expectations, precisely so there is something to refer to when this happens. The absence of a contract makes the conversation harder, not easier.

Organisations need what they say they need, which is often unglamorous and often money.

Why the role is precarious

Coordination is a core cost rather than a project activity, which places it exactly in the category of spending grants are least willing to fund. It is therefore frequently part-time, frequently combined with three other jobs, and frequently the first post cut under financial pressure.

Removing it does not remove the work; it distributes it across people who are also doing something else. The consequences appear a year later as volunteer numbers falling and compliance records slipping, by which point the cause is not obvious. Funding a coordinator is one of the least visible and most leveraged things a donor can pay for.

The takeaway

The kindest thing you can do for a coordinator is turn up when you said you would.

Give the boring thing they asked for rather than the interesting thing you have.

Questions readers ask

What is the most useful thing to tell a coordinator when I apply?

Your genuine availability, how long you expect to stay, and any constraints. Accurate information about a small commitment is far more useful than an optimistic account of a large one.

Why does it take weeks to start volunteering?

Checks, references and training have external turnaround times the organisation does not control. Starting the paperwork early is the only thing that shortens it.

Volunteeringcoordinationstaff rolesvolunteer management
More in Volunteering
Manas Chaurasia
Contributing writer, Goodwilly

Manas writes about second-hand markets and what holds its value.

Also by Manas Chaurasia